Legal Opinion
Stoiber v. Honeychuck
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 1980No. Docket Nos. 4001, 4044, 4240, 4255PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*911Opinion
FRANSON, J.
These consolidated proceedings (three appeals and a petition for writ of mandate) arise from a lawsuit filed by appellant-petitioner Mary Stoiber (hereinafter appellant) against William T. Earley and Ruth V. Earley, owners of the premises which had been occupied by appellant and her family under a month-to-month tenancy. The suit also names Irene Honeychuck, Frank P. Smith Realty and Management, Inc., Ron Perkins and Doe defendants as managing agents of the premises. Appellant seeks to hold the owners and managing agents liable for damages resulting from the dilapidated and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. KirbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Perdue v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Becker v. IRM Corp.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Application Group, Inc. v. Hunter Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.