Legal Opinion
Good v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 16, 1998No. C 98-0894 CW. (MDL 1061)PublishedCited by 144 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY
WILKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Walter L. Good moves to remand this case to State Court and seeks attorneys’ fees incurred as a result of the removal. Defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”) opposes. Prudential moves separately to stay all proceedings in this ease pending a final decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“the MDL Panel”) whether to transfer this ease. Mr. Good opposes. The matter was decided on the papers. Having considered all of the papers filed by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Samuel "Wesley" McCabe and John Elson v. General Foods Corporation, Alan Moltz, Abner Ladson and Does 1-100Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Saunders v. CarissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Lippert v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- Mireles v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Plute v. Roadway Package System, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2001
- MacEy v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Diaz v. Allstate Insurance GroupDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Emma Mercado v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.