Legal Opinion
Fiol v. Doellstedt
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 19, 1996No. B092939PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1322Opinion
GRIGNON, J.
Plaintiff and appellant Giovanni Fiol appeals from a judgment of dismissal after defendant and respondent Jon Doellstedt’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted without leave to amend in this sexual harassment action. In the published portion of this opinion we conclude a nonharassing supervisor, who fails to take action to prevent sexual harassment, is not personally liable for sexual harassment under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), as either an aider and abettor of the harasser or the employer, or as an agent of the employer. In the unpublished…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Phyllis Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., Dba Maxwell's Plum, Debtor in Possession Carlo Galazzo, Gen. Mgt., Dino La Rosa Don Bohn Don SchupakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Coramae Ella Gary v. James Edward LongCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Casey v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Berryman v. Merit Property Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.