Legal Opinion
Hayman v. Shoemake
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 1, 1962No. Civ. 86PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P.J.
The cross-defendants, Dick Carey and F. H. Woodruff & Son, Inc., appeal from a judgment in favor of the cross-complainants, A. C. Shoemake, Walter Gnesa, Francis Gnesa and Henry Gnesa, for $93,523.68 based upon a sale of onion seed.
The plaintiffs, Louis Hayman and George Covert, purchased from the defendants and cross-complainants an interest in the field of onions grown from the seed and sued the defendants on their express warranty that the onions were Asgrow Y-50’s, -a particular variety which had previously produced excellent crops in the San Joaquin Valley. The cause was tried without a…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Tyco Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Grinnell v. Charles Pfizer & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Walker v. Signal Companies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Klein v. Asgrow Seed Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Posz v. BurchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.