Robinson v. City of Glendale
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The court below sustained a demurrer to the complaint and thereupon rendered judgment in favor of the defendants, from which the plaintiff appeals. The grounds of the demurrer were that the complaint did not state a cause of action and also that it was uncertain in several particulars.
The complaint alleged that in 1908 the plaintiff and several other persons were the owners in fee in severalty of certain parcels of real estate, eight in number, immediately outside of the city of Glendale; that in said year said land owners, for the purpose of supplying their lands with domestic water, laid in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Payne & Dewey v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Fredericks v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Copeland v. Fairview Land & Water Co. & Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Gray v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- South Shore Land Co. v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Aronson & Co. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Balestra v. ButtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Garden Water Corp. v. FambroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Peninsula Properties Co. v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.