Legal Opinion

Aronson & Co. v. Pearson

California Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1926No. Docket No. L.A. 9014PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINCH, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by the defendant from the judgment herein against her, based upon her alleged liability as a stockholder of the Pearson Ranch Company, a corporation, having a capital stock of $500,000, divided into 5,000 shares of the par value of $100 each.

In May, 1922, 4,749 shares of such stock were issued to W. J. Pearson, the husband of defendant, they having been married in the year 1909. This action is prosecuted on the theory that the defendant was at all times the equitable owner of such shares of stock and the court so found. The principal question presented by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Naftzger v. GreggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Robinson v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Turner v. WatkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. Nave v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cockerell v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. May v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Overton v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Oliver v. the Swiss Club TellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Richert v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API