Balestra v. Button
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, J. pro tem.
This is an action for a mandatory injunction commanding and requiring defendant to restore the connection of a certain telephone line to a line known as the “Button and Griffin Line” connecting with the town of Winters’ telephone exchange. Prom a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant has appealed.
In 1920, Joseph Balestra purchased the land now owned by plaintiffs. At the time of the purchase and for some time prior thereto, defendant R. L. Button, Nancy Button and John Griffin owned and maintained a telephone line, known as the “Button and Griffin Line,” extending from…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Copeland v. Fairview Land & Water Co. & Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Keating Implement & Machine Co. v. Marshall Electric Light & Power Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
- Lindenmuth v. Safe Harbor Water Power Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cedar Point Nursery v. HassidSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Buehler v. Oregon-Washington Plywood Corp.California Supreme Court · 1976
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.