Putman v. Cameron
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The primary question for decision is whether an agreement was made prior to the commencement of this action, settling the-controversy of the parties.
April 15, 1947, respondent leased to appellant her valuable home at Pacific Palisades for one year. At the expiration of the. term, they agreed upon a continuance of the lease on a month-to-month basis. The lease was terminated and possession was restored to respondent in February 1950. At different "times she inspected her property with certain employees of appellant and checked her inventory. First his secretary, then his accountant made notes…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rice v. California Lutheran HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Burgess v. California Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Cobb v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Talmadge v. ArrowHead Reservoir Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Los Angeles Immigration & Cooperative Ass'n v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alaska Creamery Products, Inc. v. WellsAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Barendregt v. DowningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Enslow v. Von GuenthnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Coleman Engineering Co. v. North American Aviation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Coleman Engineering Co. v. North American Aviation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.