Legal Opinion
Barendregt v. Downing
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 2, 1959No. Civ. 6139PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.
Appellants brought this action for specific performance and damages because of respondent’s alleged refusal to perform a contract for the sale of real property. Respondent filed a cross-complaint seeking to rescind the contract and for damages in the amount of $50,000, alleging that appellants had conspired with others to obtain her property by means of fraudulent misrepresentations and duress.
The trial was held during April, 1958, but arguments were delayed until July 1, 1958, because of the illness of the trial judge. Findings were signed by the trial court and thereafter on August 26,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Stickel v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Reimer v. FirpoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Warburton v. KieferleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Scheeline v. MoshierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Haseltine v. HaseltineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Kam Chin Chun Ming v. Kam Hee HoHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
- Estate of BartholomaeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Bordin v. BordinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Warner v. O'CONNORCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.