Legal Opinion

Alaska Creamery Products, Inc. v. Wells

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1962No. 137PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AREND, Justice.

This appeal involves a dispute as to the effect of an alleged later agreement between the parties upon their existing sale and distribution contract. More specifically the question raised is this: Was there a later agreement in relation to the existing contract and, if so, was it a novation (substituted contract) or an executory accord which may or may not have been later satisfied ?

The undisputed facts are that on April 9, 1959, the appellant, Alaska Creamery Products, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the Creamery, entered into a written sale and distribution contract with the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Ayoob v. AyoobCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Dorsey Et Ux. v. Tisby Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Whepley Oil Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. K & K RECYCLING, INC. v. Alaska Gold Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Rego v. DeckerAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Hall v. Add-Ventures, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Jackson v. WhiteAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Hausam v. WodrichAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API