Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1935No. L. A. 15253PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Plaintiff and respondent Augustus M. Cobb will be referred to, when not designated by name, as the insured or respondent. The Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company, a corporation, will be referred to as the company, or as insurer, or as appellant. Respondent Cobb brought this action against The Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company, a corporation, upon two policies of insurance issued by said company to insured Cobb, during the month of August, 1929. One of said policies was upon the life of the insured, and therefore it is only collaterally involved in the action. The other, No. 5603198,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. New York Life Insurance v. EnglishTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Robinson v. Exempt Fire Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Washington County v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  5. Metropolitan Life Ins. v. LambertMississippi Supreme Court · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. ViglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Caminetti v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Erreca v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Alder v. DrudisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API