Talmadge v. ArrowHead Reservoir Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
It is alleged in the complaint in this case that in April, 1892, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement, which is set out in full, and the material parts of which are as follows: "Whereas, the Arrowhead Reservoir Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Kentucky, and doing business in the county of San Bernardino, state of California, is desirous of purchasing from F. L. Talmadge” the east half of a certain sixteenth section of land in San Bernardino county; and “whereas, said parties cannot agree among themselves as to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Breckinridge v. CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- California Annual Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church v. SeitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Los Angeles Immigration & Cooperative Ass'n v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by25 opinions
- Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Bewick v. MechamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Dillingham v. DahlgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Hardy v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Wineburgh v. GayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.