Sperry v. Crompton Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*489In a purported class action to recover damages, inter alia, for antitrust violations and unjust enrichment, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Parga, J.), dated November 20, 2003, as granted the motion of the defendants Crompton Corporation, Uniroyal Chemical Company, Inc., Uniroyal Chemical Company Limited, Flexsys NY Flexsys America, LR Bayer Corporation, and Rhein Chemie Corporation pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the antitrust and unjust enrichment claims.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kagan v. K-Tel Entertainment, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Cox v. Microsoft Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Outrigger Construction Co. v. Bank Leumi Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Sybelle Carpet & Linoleum of Southampton, Inc. v. East End Collaborative, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Paltre v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- In Re G-Fees Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- In re Automotive Parts Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. E & M ESR, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re Automotive Parts Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.