Cox v. Microsoft Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*40Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered July 17, 2003, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant Microsoft’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ second cause of action for deceptive acts and practices under General Business Law § 349 and the class action relief sought thereunder, and granted such motion to the extent of dismissing plaintiffs’ fourth cause of action for unjust enrichment, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of denying Microsoft’s motion to dismiss the fourth cause of action for unjust enrichment, said cause of action is reinstated,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Super Glue Corp. v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Ridge Meadows Homeowners' Ass'n v. Tara Development Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Zurakov v. Register.Com, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by55 opinions
- Choi v. Tower Research Capital LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Greene v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- In Re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.