Legal Opinion
In re Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 3, 2014No. Master File No. 12-md-02311; Nos. 2:12-cv-00302, 2:12-cv-00303PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ COLLECTIVE MOTION TO DISMISS INDIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS
MARIANNE O. BATTANI, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Collective Motion to the Dismiss End-Payor Plaintiff Consolidated Amended Complaint and the Automobile Dealer Plaintiff Consolidated Class Complaint (Doc. Nos. 88 (sealed) and 89, Exhibit 1 (redacted) in 12-302 and Doc. Nos. 55 (sealed) and 56 (redacted) in 12-303). Automobile Dealer Plaintiff and End-Payor Plaintiff (collectively “Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs” or “IPPs”) bring class actions against…
2Cases cited136 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In re Target Corp. Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- In re Niaspan Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Gamboa v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- In re Suboxone (Buprenorphine Hydrochloride & Naloxone) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.