Legal Opinion
In re Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 25, 2014No. Master File No. 12-md-02311; Nos. 2:12-cv-00602, 2:12-cv-00603PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ COLLECTIVE MOTION TO DISMISS INDIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS
MARIANNE O. BATTANI, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Collective Motion to Dismiss End-Payor Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (Doc. No. 65 in 12-603), and Automobile Dealer Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Class Complaint (Doc. No. 62 in 12-602). Defendant movants include TRW Automotive Holdings Corp., TRW Deutschland Holding GMBH, TRAM, Inc., Tokai Rika Co., Ltd.; Autoliv Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc., Autoliv B.V. & Co., KG, Autoliv Japan Limited,…
2Cases cited111 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- In re FCA US LLC Monostable Electronic Gearshift LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- In re Remicade Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- In re Lidoderm Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Blurton v. Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.