Legal Opinion

In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided April 3, 2019No. 14-MD-2542 (VSB)PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vernon S. Broderick, United States District Judge

Before me are four motions to dismiss filed by Defendant Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. ("Keurig" or "Defendant"),1 formerly known as Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and as successor to Keurig, Incorporated, in this multi-district litigation. This Opinion & Order addresses all pending motions, which seek dismissal of four separate amended complaints: (1) the First Amended and Supplemental Complaint of Plaintiff JBR, Inc. (d/b/a Rogers Family Company) ("Rogers"), a privately held roaster, packager, and seller of coffee products, which alleges…

2Cases cited165 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. 3Shape Trios A/S v. Align Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020
  2. Airquip, Inc. v. HomeAdvisor, IncDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
  3. B & R Supermarket, Inc. v. Visa, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2024
  4. Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  5. Eminah Properties LLC v. Energizer Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2021

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API