Legal Opinion

Myers v. Patterson

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1987No. A036228PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SMITH, J.

The Elections Code requires that proponents of city initiative measures publish and file a “notice of intention” before circulating a signature petition (§§ 4002-4003) and that each section of the circulated petition bear a copy of the notice (§ 4004). (All statutory references will be to the Elections Code unless noted otherwise.)

Plaintiffs, proponents of a commercial rent control ordinance they sought to place on the November 1986 ballot in the City and County of San Francisco (city), failed to include the notice on their petition, and defendant Jay Patterson, the city’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Assembly v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Stasher v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Zeilenga v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alliance for a Better Downtown Millbrae v. WadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. San Francisco Forty-Niners v. NishiokaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Ibarra v. City of CarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Nelson v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Bayside Auto & Truck Sales, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API