Legal Opinion
Bayside Auto & Truck Sales, Inc. v. Department of Transportation
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 8, 1993No. A059528PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SMITH, Acting P. J.
Bayside Auto and Truck Sales, Inc. (Bayside) appeals from an order denying its petition for writ of mandate to compel the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to offer it for sale real property in San Francisco which it has leased from the state since 1973. The main contention here, as below, is that Caltrans had a mandatory duty to offer Bayside the land for sale as excess property under section 118 et seq. of the Streets and Highways Code (all further section references are to that code unless noted otherwise) and Caltrans regulations. We affirm the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Robbins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Loder v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Assembly v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Utz v. AureguyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Int'l Medication Sys., Inc. v. Assessment App. Bd. of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Mark G. v. John G.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Pipe Trades District Council No. 51 v. AubryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- San Luis Coastal Unified School District v. City of Morro BayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Mirvis v. CrowderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.