San Francisco Forty-Niners v. Nishioka
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARCHIANO, J.
The San Francisco Superior Court issued a writ of mandate prohibiting respondent San Francisco Director of Elections from qualifying an initiative measure for the ballot. The writ issued on the ground that the circulating initiative petition contained false statements intended to mislead voters and induce them to sign the petition. The three proponents of the initiative appeal from the judgment granting the writ. We affirm because an initiative petition which contains objectively inaccurate information and calculated untruths that substantially mislead and misinform a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Rossi v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Clark v. BurleighCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Boyd v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Larson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2019
- Alliance for a Better Downtown Millbrae v. WadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- City of San Diego v. DunklCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Chula Vista Citizens for Jobs & Fair Competition v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Citizens for Jobs & the Economy v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.