Legal Opinion

Alliance for a Better Downtown Millbrae v. Wade

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 2003No. A099453PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEMELLO, J.

Does a city elections official have authority to refuse to certify an initiative petition based on extrinsic evidence relating to the manner of its circulation? We conclude that she does not, and that an elections official’s role in certifying an initiative petition is confined to the ministerial task of examining the four comers of the petition for compliance with submission requirements. Here, a city clerk refused to certify an initiative petition after deciding based on extrinsic evidence that it was circulated in violation of state law. This fact finding exceeded the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Lake v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Building Industry Ass'n v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Costa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Carson Citizens for Reform v. KawagoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. MHC Financing Limited Partnership Two v. City of SanteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Lindelli v. Town of San AnselmoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API