Legal Opinion

Speckel Ex Rel. Speckel v. Perkins

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 2, 1985No. C5-84-1850PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This dispute arose out of pretrial settlement negotiation letters, one of which erroneously contained an offer of $50,000. The trial court ordered performance of the settlement agreement. We reverse.

FACTS

The disputed agreement purportedly settled a personal injury action. Sandra Speekel was injured when a car driven by Laurri Perkins collided with a truck driven by Beverly Speekel, in which Sandra Speck-el was a passenger.

In December 1983 Speckel’s attorney, Stephen Eckman, demanded the insurance policy limits of $50,000 to settle the case. In January 1984 Perkins’…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. In Re Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore PropertiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Wender Presses, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. Jallen v. AgreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Olson v. ShephardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. TNT Properties, Ltd. v. Tri-Star Developers LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Sumerel v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Skalbeck v. Agristor LeasingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Eide v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Riley Bros. Construction, Inc. v. ShuckCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API