Legal Opinion
Skalbeck v. Agristor Leasing
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 25, 1986No. C8-85-2033PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
Robert and Joan Skalbeck appeal from an order to enforce a settlement agreement. The Skalbecks contend the trial court erred in concluding a settlement was authorized and accepted. We affirm.
FACTS
In January of 1980, the Skalbecks purchased a silo and unloader from respondent Minnesota Harvestore, Inc. The transaction was financed through a lease agreement with respondent Agristor Leasing. The equipment was originally manufactured by respondent A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.
When the Skalbecks experienced difficulty in unloading silage to feed their livestock, they…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Holt v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Speckel Ex Rel. Speckel v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Albert v. Edgewater Beach Building Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Rosenberg v. Townsend, Rosenberg & Young, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Eggleston v. Keller Drug Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State ex rel. Allstate Insurance v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- STATE EX REL. ALLSTATE INS. v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Rice Lake Contracting Corp. v. Rust Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Schumann v. Northtown Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Barry v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.