Legal Opinion
Sumerel v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 28, 2009No. 07CA2465PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GABRIEL.
Defendant, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Goodyear), appeals from the district court’s order holding that Goodyear had entered into a valid and enforceable settlement agreement with Bob and Sallie Sumerel, Steven and Ann Berzin, Dane and Kerry Dicke, and Bart Kaufman (collectively plaintiffs). Because we conclude that the November 2, 2006 e-mail and erroneous charts that Goodyear’s counsel sent to plaintiffs’ counsel did not constitute an offer capable of acceptance, and because even if there were such an offer, any agreement based on it would be unenforceable, we…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bourque v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- John A. Newman v. Irwin Schiff, John A. Newman v. Irwin SchiffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Marquardt v. PerryColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Powder Horn Constructors, Inc. v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Yaekle v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. AlemayehuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Harper v. Mancos School District Re-6District Court, D. Colorado · 2011
- Rdp Technologies, Inc. v. Cambi AsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Grosvenor v. Qwest Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2012
- Legro v. RobinsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.