Legal Opinion
Eide v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 17, 1992No. C7-92-809PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellant's claim for underinsured benefits against respondent was initially heard by an arbitration panel. The arbitration award was vacated by the trial court on the ground that the arbitrators exceeded their authority in deciding the dispute. Appellant challenges the trial court’s vacation of that award.
FACTS
In early 1986, appellant Janice Eide was injured when the car she was driving was struck by an uninsured motor vehicle. At the time of the collision, Eide was insured for uninsured motorist coverage with respondent State Farm Insurance Company.
Eide retained…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Jadwin v. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. SundquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Singh v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
- All Metro Supply, Inc. v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Reinhardt v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Soderbeck v. Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- EEP Workers' Compensation Fund v. Fun & Sun, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.