Legal Opinion
Greenspan v. LADT, LLC
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 2010No. B213866PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MALLANO, P. J.
A trust filed this action alleging breach of contract and other claims against two affiliated companies, only one of which was a party to the contract. The trust also named as a defendant the individual who controlled the companies. Defendants petitioned the trial court to compel arbitration of the claims. The trial court granted the petition.
The parties selected an arbitrator associated with JAMS. Previously, some of the parties, including the trust and the individual defendant, had chosen JAMS and the same arbitrator to hear a separate dispute. Before the arbitrator…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. Ruth StudleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Greenspan v. LADT LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Gonski v. Second Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Cooper v. Lavely & Singer Professional Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Hartley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.