Legal Opinion

Richter v. Walker

California Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1951No. Sac. 6000PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiff sued to foreclose a claimed mechanic’s lien for $3,187.22, with interest, for labor performed and materials furnished assertedly under an oral contract to drill a water well on the land of defendants Donald Walker and Ona Walker. These defendants joined issue denying that plaintiff had performed his contract, and cross-complained for damages for breach of contract. The trial court determined that plaintiff had not performed the contract, that such work as was done had not been done in a good or workmanlike manner, and disallowed the lien; it did, however, allow plaintiff the sales…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Strudthoff v. YatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Stone v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Powell v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Leming v. Oilfields Trucking Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Runyan v. Pacific Air Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Auer v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API