Lyden v. Spohn-Patrick Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Two separate actions were consolidated in the court below and tried together. The first action was against the Spohn-Patrick Company alone, upon a complaint for the recovery of money on a contract. The second action was begun one week after the first action. It was against the Spohn-Patrick Company, the John H. Spohn Company, and certain persons alleged to be directors of both companies. Its object was to declare fraudulent and set aside a suspected transfer by the Spohn-Patrick Company of all its property to the other company above named.
The complaint for money stated three separate causes…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McMinn v. WhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Kaiser v. DaltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- First National Bank v. EastmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Ohm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Scholle v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Colby v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Windle, Adm'x v. FlinnOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Doudell v. ShooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Ohio Electric Car Co. v. Le SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.