First National Bank v. Eastman
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. W. J. McIntyre, and J. S. Chapman, for Hugh Lennox, Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This action was brought to have a certain deed made by defendant Eastman to defendant Lennox set aside as fraudulent and to have the premises therein described declared to be subject to the lien of an attachment procured by plaintiff against Eastman. The court filed findings, upon which judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff as prayed. Defendant Lennox made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and this appeal is by Lennox from, the judgment and order denying his motion. It is contended by the appellant that the pleadings and evidence do not sustain the findings and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Mohn v. TingleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Moore v. SchneiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Park v. PowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Hartford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.