Legal Opinion

Windle, Adm'x v. Flinn

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1952PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

Mary M. Windle, the appellant, is impleaded as a party plaintiff in two different capacities: (1) as the administratrix of the estate of J. E. Windle, her deceased husband, and (2) in her individual capacity. The status of Mildred Windle Flinn, Jeanette Windle Andrews, June Windle Stout and Carmen Windle of the defendants-respondents is not disclosed by the complaint nor is any relief requested for or against either of them. The defendant-respondent, Will H. Masters, trustee, is alleged to be the trustee under the purported instrument which occasions this litigation. All of the defendants…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Newman v. DoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Musgrave Et Ux. v. Lucas Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Oregon Creamery Manufacturers Ass'n v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Medford v. Pacific National Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In the Matter of Fbn Food Services, Inc., Debtor. River Bank AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Oregon Medical Ass'n v. RawlsOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Rice v. RabbOregon Supreme Court · 2014

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API