Ohio Electric Car Co. v. Le Sage
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
—The defendant Le Sage appeals on the judgment-roll alone from a judgment against .him. His only point is that the complaint does not state a cause of action against him.
' The plaintiff contends that the appellant cannot raise this point because the demurrer to the complaint was a joint demurrer in behalf of all the defendants and that as the complaint is conceded to be good as against some of the defendants, it must be held good as to all of them upon a joint demurrer. In Asevado v. Orr, 100 Cal. 300, [34 Pac. 777], the court said that “a joint demurrer by all of the defendants must be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Asevado v. OrrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- London & San Francisco Bank, Ltd. v. ParrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Pierce v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Elder v. KutnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Alberts v. American Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Warren A. Ott, and Mortgage Services of Norfolk, Inc., a Corporation v. Home Savings & Loan Association, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Tietke v. ForrestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Advance Industrial Finance Co. v. Western Equities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Ohio Electric Car Co. v. Le SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.