Ohm v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Writ of review from the Supreme Court to annual an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, directing an alleged creditor of an estate to commence and prosecute an action in the name of the administratrix. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
The petitioner is administratrix of the estate of E. F. Ohm, deceased. On March 23,1889, Mrs. Judge filed a petition in the superior court asking for an order directing the administratrix to allow her name to be used in an action to be brought against the surviving wife of the deceased (Augusta L. Ohm), to set aside a conveyance of certain land made by E. F. Ohm in his lifetime to his said wife, with intent to defraud his creditors. It was alleged that at the time of the conveyance E. F. was indebted to sundry persons in the sum of about ninety thousand dollars, including a debt to petitioner…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McMinn v. WhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Estes v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Mesmer v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- O'Connor v. BoylanMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Fletcher v. HolmesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885
3Cited by24 opinions
- Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Riley v. MartinelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Ziska v. ZiskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- First National Bank of Rock Springs v. LudvigsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1899
- Scholle v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.