Legal Opinion

People v. Vann

California Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1900No. Crim. No. 624PublishedCited by 27 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

Defendant was convicted of an assault with intent to commit rape. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The evidence shows that the person upon whom the alleged assault was made was a girl under sixteen years of age; that she went voluntarily to the room of defendant by previous appointment, and made no resistance.

1. It is claimed that the verdict is contrary to the evidence. The argument is, that although under the statute a girl under the age of sixteen is incapable of consenting to the crime of rape, yet if she consents to the attempt…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Prople v. Le RoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. People v. VerdegreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. People v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. People v. HarlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API