People v. Craig
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
Defendant was prosecuted and found guilty upon two counts of rape based on a single act of intercourse committed without the consent and against the will of a sixteen year old girl. Count 1 of the information charged that the rape was accomplished by force and violence, contrary to the provisions of subdivision 3 of section 261 of the Penal Code. Count 2, after alleging that it was “a different statement of the same offense”, charged statutory rape upon a child under the age of consent, contrary to the provisions of subdivision 1 of the section. Each count also charged a prior conviction of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. KynetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- People v. ColtrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- People v. JaillesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- In re WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. TidemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.