Legal Opinion

People v. Craig

California Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1941No. Crim. 4327PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Defendant was prosecuted and found guilty upon two counts of rape based on a single act of intercourse committed without the consent and against the will of a sixteen year old girl. Count 1 of the information charged that the rape was accomplished by force and violence, contrary to the provisions of subdivision 3 of section 261 of the Penal Code. Count 2, after alleging that it was “a different statement of the same offense”, charged statutory rape upon a child under the age of consent, contrary to the provisions of subdivision 1 of the section. Each count also charged a prior conviction of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. KynetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. People v. ColtrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. People v. JaillesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. People v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. In re WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. TidemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API