People v. Harlan
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County and from orders denying a new trial and denying a motion in arrest of judgment. Joseph W. Hughes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
The defendant was convicted of rape, charged to have been committed on a girl under the age of consent, and sentenced to a term of forty years in the state prison at San Quentin. He appeals from the judgment of conviction, from an order denying his motion for a new trial, and from an order denying his motion in arrest of judgment.
1. The verdict of conviction finds'ample support in the evidence. That the defendant had sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix in the most brutal manner conceivable is established by the testimony of the prosecutrix, and by the boastful admissions of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. GoldensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Sherman v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. BencCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- People v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Gird v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. HurlburtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.