People v. Babcock
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. Frank R. Willis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
The defendant was informed against for the crime of rape, alleged to have been committed upon a female under the age of sixteen years, and upon his trial under such information was convicted of the crime of “assault with intent to commit the crime of rape.” From the judgment of imprisonment pronounced on said conviction and from an order denying his motion for a new trial, he appealed to the district court of appeal, and such appeals have been regularly transferred to this court for hearing and determination.
The particular kind of rape charged by the information was that 'defined by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. ShearsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. CourierMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. FellowsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- People v. PeeteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- People v. NakisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- David Luther Ghent v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Olsen v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.