Legal Opinion

People v. Snyder

California Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1888No. 20376PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. John B. Whaley, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

— The information charges the appellant with the crime of rape, and the jury found him guilty. The charging language of the information, after proper averments of time, place, etc., is that the defendant, “with force and arms in and upon one Louisa Bell, a female over the age of ten years, who was not then and there the wife of the said John H. Snyder, violently and feloniously did make an assault, and her, the said Louisa Bell, then and there, to wit, on the day and year last aforesaid, feloniously did ravish and carnally know and accomplish with her an act of sexual intercourse by force,…

2Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. LohbauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API