Legal Opinion

People v. Verdegreen

California Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1895No. 21187PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.

Defendant was convicted of an assault with intent to rape, and was sentenced to a term of years in the state prison. He appeals from the judgment.

1. The evidence disclosed that the object of the alleged assault was a girl of the age of seven years; that she went voluntarily to the room of defendant, and submitted, without resistance, to his advances. Upon this evidence defendant requested the court to charge the jury that: “ In an assault with intent to commit rape there must not only be an intent to commit a rape, but that intent must be manifested by an assault upon the person intended to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
  2. State v. PickettNevada Supreme Court · 1876
  3. People v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. People v. TobiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Ross v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
  5. State v. NagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API