Legal Opinion

People v. Marshall

California Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1957No. Crim. 6002PublishedCited by 193 opinions

Roy A. Gustafson, District Attorney (Ventura), as Amicus Curiae.

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Defendant pleaded not guilty to a charge alleged in the information in the following terms: “Robbery, in violation of section 211, Penal Code, . . . committed as follows: That [defendant] . . . did willfully, unlawfully, feloniously and forcibly take from the person and immediate presence of Jack J. Martens . . . Seventy Dollars . . . and an automobile . . .” Jury trial was waived. After trial, the court found defendant guilty of “Violation of 503 Vehicle Code, a felony, a lesser but necessarily included offense, ’ ’ and sentenced defendant to serve nine months in the county jail. Defendant…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People v. CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by193 opinions

  1. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. IrelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API