Legal Opinion

Carbine v. Meyer

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1954No. Civ. 8410PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Plaintiff commenced an action against defendant to restrain defendant from using a road on the land owned by plaintiff and her husband as joint tenants, and for damages for alleged trespass by defendant. Defendant filed an answer claiming that she owned an easement over plaintiff’s land and also filed a cross-complaint seeking to quiet title to the claimed easement. At the conclusion of the trial before the court defendant was granted leave to file an amendment to her answer adding the defense of the statute of limitations. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 338, subd. 2, 343.) The court ordered judgment…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Kafka v. BozioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Williams v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Swartzbaugh v. SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Green v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Kornoff v. Kingsburg Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. County of Allegheny v. Merrit Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Ianotti v. CiccioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Polin v. Chung ChoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API