Legal Opinion

Ianotti v. Ciccio

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 28, 1991No. 14081PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The issues in this appeal are: (1) the extent to which one cotenant can convey an easement in land without the contemporaneous consent or subsequent ratification of the other cotenant; and (2) the residual power of the latter cotenant to avoid such a conveyance. The plaintiffs, John and Dechantel Ianotti, brought the underlying action to quiet title1 to land that they held as joint tenants, and in which the defendant, Rose Ciccio,2 claimed an easement by virtue of a purported quitclaim deed signed by John Ianotti alone. The defendant raised a special defense that the deed was effective to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Palmer v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Botticello v. StefanoviczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Varnum v. AbbotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  4. Mitchell v. HazenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
  5. Griswold v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1824

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Knickerbocker v. CannonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bloom v. MiklovichConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. Coan v. Bernier (In Re Bernier)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
  4. Eisenberg v. TuchmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. Treglia v. ZaneskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API