Legal Opinion

Narlian v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1943No. L. A. 18490PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

— -This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Board of Governors of The State Bar that petitioner be disbarred from the practice of law.

By a notice to show cause issued in August, 1941, petitioner was charged with the commission of acts involving moral turpitude and with the violation of his oath and duty as an attorney. Prom findings of fact made at the termination of three hearings in this disciplinary matter, Local Administrative Committee No. 14 for the County of Los Angeles concluded that petitioner was guilty as charged, and that, in addition, he had commingled the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re ShattuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Marsh v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Herrscher v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Peck v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. In Re PetersenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Sturr v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Resner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. White v. ValentaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. McGregor v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API