Legal Opinion

Resner v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1960No. S. F. Nos. 20256, 20287PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Herbert Resner, a member of the State Bar, seeks a review of two disciplinary proceedings in the first of which the Board of Governors of the State Bar recommended a two year suspension. (S.F. No. 20256.) Five weeks later the Board of Governors recommended disbarment based upon the record in the earlier proceeding and the record then before it in the second matter. (S.F. No. 20287.)

The petitioner was admitted to the practice of law in 1935. He is now 50 years of age. No prior disciplinary proceedings have been taken against him. At the times in question he was conducting an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re RothrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Herrscher v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Sturr v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Maggart v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Mills v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Chefsky v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Demain v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Doyle v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Lawhorn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API