Legal Opinion

Marsh v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1934No. L. A. 14832PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This proceeding was instituted to review an order of the board of governors of The State Bar of California, adopting findings of the local administrative committee, and recommending to this court the. suspension of petitioner from the practice of the law for a period of three years.

Petitioner was admitted to practice in this state in May, 1917, and is now about 38 years old. Prom time to time his dilatory tactics have antagonized clients to such an extent that they have lodged complaints against him, but few of which, however, have proceeded to formal hearing.

About February 1, 1933,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matter of DanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Fish v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. In Re VaughanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Marsh v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. In Re PetersenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Lewis v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Clancy v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Tomlinson v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API