Legal Opinion

In Re Petersen

California Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 13225PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

On February 20, 1928, Amelia J. Rodrick, by her guardian ad litem, John Rodrick, filed with The State Bar of California her verified complaint against Cedric W. Petersen, a member of The State Bar, charging him with misconduct involving moral turpitude, constituting a ground for disbarment. Petersen was directly charged with subornation of perjury, and with compounding a felony in bringing about the marriage of the complainant with one Erasmus J. Silveria, who had been held to answer before the superior court upon a charge of statutory rape alleged to have been committed upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of BruenWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. State Bar of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. In Re ShattuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. In Re CateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Marsh v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Herrscher v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. In Re GibsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Furman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API