In Re Petersen
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
On February 20, 1928, Amelia J. Rodrick, by her guardian ad litem, John Rodrick, filed with The State Bar of California her verified complaint against Cedric W. Petersen, a member of The State Bar, charging him with misconduct involving moral turpitude, constituting a ground for disbarment. Petersen was directly charged with subornation of perjury, and with compounding a felony in bringing about the marriage of the complainant with one Erasmus J. Silveria, who had been held to answer before the superior court upon a charge of statutory rape alleged to have been committed upon…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of BruenWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- State Bar of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- In Re ShattuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- In Re CateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by25 opinions
- Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Marsh v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Herrscher v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re GibsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
- Furman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.