Harris v. Bissell
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
This is an action of unlawful detainer after breach by the defendants of a covenant of the lease under which they held certain lands. Plaintiffs were given judgment declaring the lease forfeited and awarding them damages and also the amount of rent stipulated in the lease. The defendants appeal.
By the terms of the lease the defendants expressly covenanted and agreed “that they will use said premises for sheep pasture purposes only,” and that “if default shall be made in any of the covenants herein contained, on the part or behalf of the said parties of the second part . . . then and from…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Arnold v. KrigbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Alden v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Schnittger v. RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Pfitzer v. CandeiasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Chase v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Forrester v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- D'Amico v. RiedelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Mehl v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Webb v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.