Chase v. Peters
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
In this action defendants, Homer H. Peters, Jr., Peters Investment Company (a corporation), and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (a corporation), have appealed from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff. The appeal of the last-named defendant was separately taken and will be disposed of in the opinion filed in Chase v. Peters, post, p. 815, [174 Pac. 119]).
In September, 1912, plaintiff made a written lease with defendant Homer H. Peters, Jr., leasing for a term of ninety-nine years certain real property in the city of San Diego. Prior to October, 1916, Peters, Jr., assigned the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arnold v. KrigbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Schnittger v. RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Ben Lomond Wine Co. v. SladkyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Howard v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Iburg v. FitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Forrester v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- Vasey v. California Dance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Markham v. FralickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Mihans v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Bekins v. TrullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.