Legal Opinion

Forrester v. Cook

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1930No. 4843PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFolland, J.

This action is one in unlawful detainer wherein plaintiff by her complaint sought restitution of the premises described, being an apartment house, and damages for the unlawful withholding thereof, and for an attorney’s fee. She also prayed that damages be trebled. An answer and counterclaim were filed by defendants and on motion of plaintiff the counterclaim was stricken. On the morning of the day of trial defendants filed amendments to the answer disclaiming any interest in the property in dispute as of that date and tendering possession thereof to plaintiff. The cause was thereupon tried…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Boucofski v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Arnold v. KrigbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Knight v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. McDonald v. RankinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. San Francisco & Suburban Home Building Society v. LeonardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Perkins v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Jacobson v. SwanUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Olds Bros. Lumber Co. v. RushingArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Leone v. ZunigaUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Soffe v. RiddUtah Supreme Court · 1983

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API