Legal Opinion
Pfitzer v. Candeias
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 4, 1921No. Civ. No. 2257PublishedCited by 17 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
Plaintiffs were given judgment, under the provisions of section 1174 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for the cancellation of their lease of certain premises to the defendant, on account of his breach of one of the covenants thereof, and for damages to the lands leased and those occasioned by the unlawful withholding thereof after the default of which complaint is made.
The defendant was in possession of the premises under a lease for the term of five years from the first day of January, 1918. A large part of the lands leased was in alfalfa. [1] By the terms of the lease the defendant agreed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parsons v. SmilieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Rayfield v. Van MeterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Schnittger v. RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Zucco v. FarulloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Matthews v. DiggesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
3Cited by17 opinions
- Forrester v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- Eliason v. EliasonMontana Supreme Court · 1968
- Green v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Harris v. BissellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Cavanaugh v. HighCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.