Legal Opinion

D'Amico v. Riedel

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 1949No. Civ. 17059PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs for rent, damages, attorney’s fees, restitution of the premises and forfeiture of the lease in an action in unlawful detainer, defendants appeal.

The undisputed facts are as follows: In. March, 1948, plaintiffs leased a residence and motel to defendants under a written lease agreement; the lease provided for rental at the rate of $500 per month and reasonable attorney’s fees should it become necessary to bring an action under the lease. Defendants failed to pay the rent instalments due on June 1, 1948, and July 1, 1948, whereupon plaintiffs served upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Servais v. KleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Harris v. BissellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Heller v. MellidayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Smith v. WhyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. William Wilson Co. v. TrainorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Fragomeno v. Insurance Co. of the WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Richard v. Degen & Brody, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Knowles v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Fifth & Broadway Partnership v. Kimny, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API